Answer 2–3 sentences per question. Do not give one-word answers.
Q1
How often do you use technology in your daily life?
Technology is an integral part of almost every hour of my day. I use my smartphone constantly — for communication, navigation, news, and work. It would be difficult to imagine managing my daily schedule without it, though I do try to set aside some screen-free time in the evenings.
Q2
What kind of apps do you use most frequently?
I use messaging apps like LINE and WhatsApp the most, followed by productivity tools for managing tasks and calendars. I've also become quite reliant on language learning apps in recent months. What I find useful is that these apps allow me to learn in short bursts throughout the day rather than setting aside large blocks of time.
Q3
Do you think technology has made life easier or more complicated?
On balance, I would say technology has made life considerably easier, but it has also introduced new sources of complexity and stress. Tasks that once required hours — booking travel, banking, finding information — now take minutes. However, the constant connectivity can feel overwhelming, and the expectation that one should always be available creates a kind of digital pressure that previous generations did not experience.
Q4
How has technology changed the way people communicate?
Technology has made communication instantaneous and borderless in a way that was unimaginable just a generation ago. I can video call someone on the other side of the world for free. That said, some people argue that digital communication has reduced the depth and quality of our interactions — text messages and emojis are convenient, but they lack the nuance and warmth of face-to-face conversation.
Q5
Do you prefer to use technology or traditional methods for learning?
I find myself using a combination of both. For absorbing new concepts quickly, online videos and apps are excellent — they are interactive and I can control the pace. But when I need to truly understand and retain something, I still prefer reading a physical book or writing notes by hand. Research seems to support this — handwriting reinforces memory in ways that typing does not.
Prepare 1 minute — you may make notes — then speak for 1–2 minutes
Describe a place in nature that you find beautiful.
You should say:
where this place is
when you went there
what you saw there
and explain why you find it beautiful
1:00
2:00
I'd like to describe a waterfall I visited in the mountains of northern Thailand, near Chiang Mai, called Mae Ya Waterfall. I went there about two years ago during a family trip, in the cool season when the water level is at its highest.
The waterfall itself is quite dramatic — it drops approximately 280 metres down a series of cascading limestone tiers, surrounded by dense tropical forest. What struck me immediately was the sheer scale of it: the sound of the water was almost overwhelming, and the mist it created kept the surrounding vegetation glistening. I also remember seeing dozens of exotic butterflies attracted by the moisture in the air.
What makes it beautiful to me is not just the visual spectacle but the sensory totality of the experience. The combination of the roaring sound, the cool mist on your skin, the smell of wet earth and foliage — it creates a feeling of being completely immersed in something larger than yourself. In a world that is increasingly dominated by screens and urban noise, places like that remind you of the extraordinary power and beauty that still exists in the natural world. I felt genuinely peaceful for the first time in months. It is a place I would love to return to. (approx. 215 words)
Part 3 — Environment & Human Responsibility (~5 min)
กลยุทธ์ Part 3 (ภาษาไทย) — กดเพื่อเปิด
ให้ความเห็นพร้อมเหตุผลและตัวอย่างเสมอ · มองประเด็นได้ทั้งสองด้านใช้คำเชื่อมแสดงเหตุผล/เปรียบเทียบ เช่น because, for instance, on the other hand · พูดให้เป็นความคิดเชิงวิเคราะห์
🔊 ฟังคำอธิบายกลยุทธ์ (เสียงภาษาไทย)
Give opinions + explain reasons + use examples
Q1
Do you think individuals or governments are more responsible for protecting the environment?
I think both have a role, but governments bear the greater responsibility. Individuals can reduce waste, recycle, and make greener consumer choices, but these actions are limited in scale. Structural change — phasing out fossil fuels, regulating industrial emissions, investing in public transport — requires policy and enforcement that only governments can deliver. As the saying goes, you cannot recycle your way out of a climate crisis. Systemic problems demand systemic solutions.
Q2
What are the most serious environmental problems facing the world today?
Without question, climate change is the most urgent, as it acts as a threat multiplier — intensifying extreme weather, sea level rise, drought, and biodiversity loss simultaneously. But I would also highlight plastic pollution, which has permeated every ecosystem on Earth including deep ocean trenches and the human bloodstream, and deforestation, which destroys carbon sinks and habitats at an alarming rate. What makes these problems particularly challenging is that they are interconnected — solving one in isolation is insufficient.
Q3
How can education help people become more environmentally aware?
Education is arguably the most powerful long-term tool we have. When children learn from an early age about ecosystems, climate science, and the consequences of human activity, they tend to carry those values into adulthood and pass them on. Countries like Sweden and Finland have integrated environmental education throughout their curricula with measurable effects on civic attitudes. Beyond schools, public campaigns, documentary films, and community programmes can reach adults who missed this in their own education. The key is making the content emotionally resonant, not just factually dense.
Q4
Do you think technology can solve environmental problems?
Technology can certainly help — and in some areas, like renewable energy and electric vehicles, it already is. However, I am cautious about what is sometimes called "techno-optimism" — the belief that innovation will automatically rescue us without requiring changes in behaviour or consumption. History suggests that new technologies often create new environmental problems alongside the ones they solve. So I see technology as a necessary but not sufficient part of the answer. It must work alongside policy, education, and genuine shifts in how we value economic growth.
Q5
Should countries that pollute more pay higher environmental taxes?
In principle, yes — the "polluter pays" principle is both economically rational and morally sound. Carbon taxes and emissions trading schemes create a financial incentive to reduce pollution, and the revenue can be reinvested in clean energy and affected communities. The challenge lies in implementation: wealthier nations have historically been the largest cumulative emitters, but rapidly developing countries argue that penalising their industrialisation is unfair given that richer nations developed without such constraints. A fair system would need to account for historical emissions as well as current output, and provide financial support to poorer nations making the transition.