อ่านผ่านเร็วหนึ่งรอบ จับใจความรวมและโครงของบทความก่อน ยังไม่ต้องเข้าใจทุกประโยคกวาดหาคำสำคัญ/คำที่ความหมายเหมือนในบทความ แล้วอ่านเฉพาะจุดนั้นละเอียด (ข้อสอบมักเปลี่ยนคำ)True / False / Not Given: ตรง = True · ขัดแย้ง = False · บทความไม่กล่าวถึงเลย = Not Given · ห้ามใช้ความรู้เดิมหรือเดาเอง
🔊 ฟังคำอธิบายกลยุทธ์ (เสียงภาษาไทย)
อ่านแต่ละบทความแล้วตอบคำถามด้านล่าง
✍️ Writing เขียนจริง + ประเมินตนเอง
กลยุทธ์การเขียน (ภาษาไทย) — กดเพื่อเปิด
Task 1 (บรรยายข้อมูล/กระบวนการ): เริ่มด้วยประโยคภาพรวม บรรยายเป็นกลุ่มตามลำดับ ห้ามใส่ความเห็น · ≥150 คำTask 2 (เรียงความ): บทนำพาราเฟรสโจทย์ + จุดยืน · 2 ย่อหน้าเนื้อหา (เหตุผล+ตัวอย่าง) · บทสรุป · ≥250 คำใช้คำเชื่อมให้เหมาะสม เช่น however, therefore, for example
🔊 ฟังคำอธิบายกลยุทธ์ (เสียงภาษาไทย)
Writing Task 1 — You should spend about 20 minutes on this task. The table below shows the percentage of students enrolled in four different university subjects (Engineering, Business, Arts and Sciences) in two countries (Country A and Country B) in 2020. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. Write at least 150 words.
Task 1 · 0 คำ (อย่างน้อย 150)
ตัวอย่าง Band 7+ (ย่อ): The table compares student enrolment across four university subjects in two countries in 2020. Overall, Business was the most popular subject in both countries, while Arts attracted the fewest students in Country A. Country B showed a notably higher proportion of Engineering students than Country A. In Country A, Business accounted for the largest share of students at 38%, followed by Sciences at 27%, Engineering at 19%, and Arts at 16%. Country B presented a slightly different pattern: Business again led at 34%, but Engineering was notably higher at 28%, while Sciences stood at 22% and Arts at 16%. The most striking difference between the two countries was in Engineering, where Country B's proportion was nearly ten percentage points higher than Country A's. In contrast, Sciences was more popular in Country A. Arts enrolment was identical in both countries at 16%.
Writing Task 2 — You should spend about 40 minutes on this task. Some people argue that governments should invest more in public transport to reduce traffic congestion, while others believe that building more roads is the better solution. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. Write at least 250 words.
Task 2 · 0 คำ (อย่างน้อย 250)
ตัวอย่าง Band 7+ (ย่อ): Traffic congestion is a major problem in cities worldwide, and debate continues about the most effective solution: expanding public transport or building more roads. This essay will examine both perspectives before presenting my own conclusion. Proponents of public transport investment argue that adding road capacity simply encourages more car use — a phenomenon known as induced demand — meaning congestion quickly returns to its previous level. By contrast, efficient, affordable public transport gives commuters a genuine alternative to the car. Cities such as Singapore and Tokyo have demonstrated that world-class metro systems can move millions of people efficiently with minimal congestion. Those in favour of road-building point out that in many areas, particularly rural regions and developing countries, public transport is not a viable option for most journeys. Roads also facilitate the movement of goods, which is essential for economic activity. For these communities, new or improved roads may represent the most practical solution. In my view, investment in public transport is the more sustainable long-term strategy for cities. Building roads increases car dependency and worsens air quality, whereas public transport can move far more people per unit of road space. However, in areas where public transport is impractical, targeted road improvements remain necessary. In conclusion, the best approach is likely to differ by context, but for urban areas, public transport investment offers greater long-term benefits than road expansion.
Describe a person you admire. You should say: • who this person is • how you know them or know about them • what they have achieved • and explain why you admire them.
Part 3 · Discussion (4–5 นาที)
ประเมิน Band การพูดของคุณ:
🎯 IELTS Full Mock Test 3 · Journey to IELTS · ฉบับฝึกฟรี · Band เป็นการประเมินเบื้องต้น